The veteran's claim for a higher rating for right heel fracture residuals is being remanded due to inconsistencies in the medical records and need for clarification of the precise disorder. The service connection claims for back and left foot disorders are not addressed as they were granted with separate evaluations.
The deciding factor: There are conflicting findings regarding the veteran's right foot conditions, necessitating a new VA examination to clarify the specific diagnosis and determine if separate evaluations are warranted.
- Claimed conditions
- right heel fracture residuals, back disorders, left foot disorders
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 2, 2006
- Citation
- 0633867
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,454 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0633867.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from securing or following substantially gainful employment prior to August 7, 2020.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the reduction in compensation benefits due to incarceration should be reconsidered as there is conflicting information about whether the Veteran violated probation or parole. The case is being remanded for further clarification.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to determine the nature and etiology of his bilateral knee, shoulder, back disorders, benign prostatic hypertrophy with urinary obstruction, incipient senile cataract, sleep apnea, erectile dysfunction, and hypertension.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for additional development of evidence, including obtaining SSA records and arranging for a VA orthopedic examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.