The veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for pseudofolliculitis barbae is being remanded due to the failure of the veteran to appear for a scheduled examination. The case will be readjudicated after the requested development.
The deciding factor: The veteran failed to appear for a scheduled skin examination, which was necessary for proper evaluation and rating of his service-connected pseudofolliculitis barbae.
- Claimed conditions
- psuedofolliculitis barbae
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 3, 2006
- Citation
- 0634176
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 684 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0634176.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for an effective date prior to March 23, 2011 for the grant of service connection for psuedofolliculitis barbae was granted. The claim to reopen his PTSD and depression claims was also granted. However, he is still denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, to include PTSD.
- Granted
The Veteran's psuedofolliculitis barbae covers between 20 to 40 percent of exposed skin, meeting the criteria for a 30 percent rating.
- Dismissed
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals regarding all issues on appeal, including the initial compensable ratings for gouty joint inflammation of the bilateral first MTP joints, psuedofolliculitis barbae and onychomycosis of the bilateral great toenails.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for psuedofolliculitis barbae and periodontal disease, finding that there was no evidence of a current disability related to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.