The Board previously denied the veteran's claim for an increased initial evaluation for right ulnar neuropathy, currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling. The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has ordered a remand due to insufficient detail in past VA examinations and failure to consider functional loss due to pain.
The deciding factor: The Board previously denied the claim based on insufficient detail in past VA examinations and failure to consider functional loss due to pain as outlined in DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995).
- Claimed conditions
- right ulnar neuropathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 6, 2006
- Citation
- 0634267
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0634267.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for right and left ulnar neuropathy, finding that the evidence does not support a causal relationship between these conditions and either in-service injury or a service-connected disability.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal of all claims on December 16, 2024.
- Partly granted
The veteran is granted special monthly compensation (SMC) based on aid and attendance due to service-connected major depressive disorder (MDD), but denied SMC based on housebound status.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for hypertension and right ulnar neuropathy as secondary to service-connected disabilities due to insufficient opinions on whether these conditions are related to military service or aggravated by service-connected disabilities.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.