The Board has remanded the case for further development, including an examination to determine if the veteran's nosebleeds began during service or are otherwise linked to his military service.
The deciding factor: The examiner was not responsive to the remand directives and must be asked to provide a more detailed opinion regarding the etiology of the veteran's nosebleeds.
- Claimed conditions
- epistaxis
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 8, 2006
- Citation
- 0634697
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,464 · Granted: 14% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0634697.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the appeals for increased ratings of deviated nasal septum, epistaxis, atrial fibrillation, and prostate cancer with urinary incontinence as they were filed more than one year after the last rating decisions.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection on four different conditions (epistaxis, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psoriasis) have been dismissed due to the Veteran's death during the appeal process.
- Dismissed
The appeal for service connection for epistaxis is dismissed. The appeal for service connection for gout (left foot) is denied.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for epistaxis and obstructive sleep apnea, but denied an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss. The anxiety disorder was granted a 100 percent rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.