The Board has granted service connection for a left eye pterygium and denied service connection for a skin disorder. Service connection for a neurological disorder of the feet is remanded.
The deciding factor: Service connection was established for a left eye pterygium due to in-service incurrence, while the skin disorders were not shown to be related to service or an undiagnosed illness attributable to Southwest Asia service during the Persian Gulf War. Service connection for the neurological disorder of the feet is remanded for further evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- Left Eye Pterygium, Peripheral Neuropathy of the Feet, Skin Disorder (including eczematous skin, hypopigmentation, and keloid scalp lesions)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 21, 2006
- Citation
- 0636280
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 3,038 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0636280.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for residuals of left eye pterygium removal and dry eye syndrome, left eye has been granted. The Veteran is now rated at 20 percent for the former condition and 10 percent for the latter.
- Denied
The Veteran's hypertension is denied as there is no evidence of its onset during service or within one year post-service, and the medical opinion found it unrelated to military service.,A non-compensable evaluation for the left 3rd finger scar from ganglion cyst excision was granted effective December 8, 2009. The Veteran's current evaluation is 10 percent after this date.,The Veteran's request for a higher evaluation for his left 3rd finger scar from ganglion cyst excision has been denied as the medical opinion found it unrelated to service and not more than 10 percent disabling overall.,A compensable evaluation (at least 20 percent) for the Veteran's left eye pterygium was denied.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service connection claims for TBI, BPV with chronic labyrinthitis, and peripheral neuropathy of the feet are granted. The Veteran is also entitled to special monthly compensation based on loss of use of both feet and need for regular aid and attendance.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render him unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation prior to January 27, 2011. The Board denied the claim for TDIU based on the evidence showing that his service-connected conditions did not prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.