The Board finds that the current 20 percent rating adequately compensates the veteran for functional loss due to pain and other factors, as his range of arm motion is effectively limited to approximately shoulder level.
The deciding factor: The objective range of motion findings vary from indicating that the veteran was able to accomplish arm motion well above shoulder level to slightly below shoulder level. Given this variability, the current 20 percent rating adequately compensates for functional loss due to pain and other factors.
- Claimed conditions
- postoperative residuals of right shoulder injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- November 28, 2006
- Citation
- 0636733
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,196 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0636733.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted a 30 percent evaluation for the veteran's service-connected postoperative residuals of right shoulder injury and denied extension of the temporary total disability rating beyond August 31, 2003 due to lack of evidence supporting such an extension.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the appellant's preexisting right shoulder, left tibia, and right ankle disabilities underwent an increase in severity during military service due to his active duty activities. Service connection is granted for these conditions on the basis of aggravation.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.