The Board denied the veteran's claim for an effective date prior to May 24, 2000 for the grant of service connection for chronic lumbosacral strain with degenerative joint disease due to lack of a valid claim before that date.
The deciding factor: There was no valid claim submitted by the veteran prior to May 24, 2000, and therefore, the effective date cannot be earlier than that date.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic lumbosacral strain with degenerative joint disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 29, 2006
- Citation
- 0636945
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 734 · Granted: 9% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0636945.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including new examinations and consideration of the TDIU claim.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's schizophrenia did not manifest during service or within one year of separation, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Denied
The VA determined that the Veteran's current lumbar spine disability, including arthritis and degenerative disc disease, was not incurred in or aggravated by service. The Board found no evidence of a chronic disability within one year after separation from service, and there is no credible evidence of continuity of symptomatology since service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered a remand due to the need for another VA examination, as the previous one is deemed inadequate.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.