The Board found that the veteran's duodenal ulcer, eye condition, and arthritis were not incurred or aggravated by service. The claim for a back disorder was denied as there was no evidence of treatment or trauma in service. The claims for dental and psychiatric disorders were also denied due to lack of secondary service connection. The hiatal hernia claim is addressed in the REMAND portion.
The deciding factor: The Board determined that the veteran's duodenal ulcer, eye condition, and arthritis did not have a link to his military service based on the absence of evidence during or shortly after service. The back disorder denial was upheld as there was no documented treatment or trauma related to the back in service.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Duodenal Ulcer","rating_assigned":null,"effective_date":null}, {"condition_name":"Eye Condition","rating_assigned":null,"effective_date":null}, {"condition_name":"Arthritis","rating_assigned":null,"effective_date":null}
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 30, 2006
- Citation
- 0637141
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0637141.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.