The veteran's claims for an increased rating and earlier effective date for a 30 percent evaluation of pulmonary sarcoidosis are being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and proper notice under the VCAA.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed, including a VA examination to determine the severity of the sarcoidosis and whether it requires chronic low dose or intermittent corticosteroids. Proper notice must be provided as required by the Veterans Claims Assistance Act (VCAA).
- Claimed conditions
- pulmonary sarcoidosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 4, 2006
- Citation
- 0637548
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0637548.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The case is remanded to obtain a more thorough medical opinion regarding the Veteran's death and whether his service, including exposure to herbicides in Thailand, caused or triggered pulmonary sarcoidosis.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for a certificate of eligibility for specially adapted housing and remanded the issue of an initial compensable disability rating for service-connected pulmonary sarcoidosis.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased rating for pulmonary sarcoidosis and a TDIU, as the evidence did not support a higher disability rating or show that his service-connected disabilities precluded him from securing or maintaining substantially gainful employment.
- Partly granted
The veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis was denied. The claims for pulmonary sarcoidosis and lung cancer were remanded for further evaluation.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.