The veteran's right orchiectomy and testicular atrophy are not service-connected under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to lack of fault on VA's part in providing care, treatment, or examination.
The deciding factor: VA did not find any evidence of fault on their part for the veteran's right testicular atrophy and subsequent orchiectomy resulting from his inguinal hernia repair in February 1987.
- Claimed conditions
- Right orchiectomy, Right testicular atrophy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 7, 2006
- Citation
- 0638100
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,020 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0638100.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation, leading to the grant of TDIU. The issue of a higher disability rating for TBI is remanded due to a duty-to-assist error.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service-connected anterior trunk scar has been granted a compensable rating. The cases of residuals from left pinky toe surgery, right big toe disability, hypertrophic gastritis, and calluses of the feet are remanded for further evaluation. Service connection for right orchiectomy is also remanded.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's residuals of a right orchiectomy did not more nearly approximate the criteria for a higher rating under either the old or new criteria, and thus denied his claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining a VA examination to determine if PTSD is present and whether residuals of right orchiectomy warrant a compensable rating. The veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD will be considered in light of any new evidence obtained.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.