The Board found that the veteran's rheumatic heart disease with mitral insufficiency is inactive and does not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show any signs of active infection, congestive heart failure, or left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction less than 50 percent. The veteran's condition was found to be inactive and asymptomatic.
- Claimed conditions
- rheumatic heart disease with mitral insufficiency
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- December 8, 2006
- Citation
- 0638331
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,175 · Granted: 22% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0638331.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected rheumatic heart disease with mitral insufficiency and severe aortic stenosis is currently rated at 100 percent, effective May 14, 2008.
- Denied
The Board denied the reopening of the claim for service connection for cardiovascular disease as secondary to rheumatic heart disease and also denied service connection on the basis of aggravation by service-connected disability. The veteran's cardiovascular disease was not found to be aggravated by his service-connected rheumatic heart disease.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected heart disability, which includes rheumatic heart disease with mitral insufficiency and history of cardiac pacemaker implantation, warrants a 30 percent rating.
- Remanded (sent back)
The RO remanded the case due to incomplete review of medical records and failure to consider a recent admission for congestive heart failure. The veteran's increased rating claim for rheumatic heart disease with mitral insufficiency is pending.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.