The VA denied a rating in excess of 10 percent for the veteran's residuals of right foot bunionectomy, finding that the condition warranted only this maximum schedular rating.
The deciding factor: The disability was rated under the appropriate code (5280) and did not meet criteria for higher ratings as there were no findings consistent with more severe impairment.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of right foot bunionectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- January 31, 2007
- Citation
- 0702879
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0702879.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's cause of death was listed as cardio-respiratory arrest due to hepatic carcinoma. The Board denied service connection for the cause of death and denied DIC benefits, finding that his service-connected disabilities did not contribute substantially or materially to his death.
- Denied
The Veteran's right foot bunionectomy residuals are currently rated at 10 percent, the maximum schedular rating available under Diagnostic Code 5284 for moderate impairment of the foot. The appeal is denied as her symptoms do not warrant a higher evaluation.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for migraine headaches as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected ethmoid sinusitis. However, it denied service connection for his other foot disorders and growth on the back due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to active service or service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to properly adjudicate the claims, including VA examinations and development of medical records. The case will be remanded for these actions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.