The Board found that the veteran's impotency is not proximately due to carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar incidence of fault on the part of VA, nor was it reasonably foreseeable. Therefore, compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for impotency has not been met.
The deciding factor: The veteran's impotency is attributed to medications prescribed by VA and his own medical conditions (alcohol dependence, depression), but the Board found that there was no evidence of carelessness or negligence on the part of VA in prescribing these medications.
- Claimed conditions
- impotency
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 12, 2007
- Citation
- 0704391
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0704391.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the claims for entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a muscular system disorder, impotency, incontinence, a nervous system disorder, and amnesia, as well as entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for cardiovascular disability and impotency due to potential exposure to herbicide agents during service in Korea. The case will be reviewed with additional medical evidence, including verification of exposure and a VA examination.
- Granted
The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 100% from February 27, 2017, to November 1, 2020. He also has service connection for headaches and impotence due to his PTSD.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for a higher rating for bilateral hearing loss, service connection for various conditions including bladder disorder, migraine disorder (claimed as light sensitivity), eye disorder, skin disorder, toenail disorder, fingernail disorder, impotency, acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD, and loss of sensation of the upper and lower extremities. The claims are being remanded due to failure to provide VA examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.