The Board is remanding the case to the RO for further action, including providing VCAA notification and readjudicating the claim.
The deciding factor: The decision was not clear on service connection theory due to lack of evidence supporting a direct link between exposure to herbicides and the veteran's condition.
- Claimed conditions
- acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 5, 2007
- Citation
- 0706329
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0706329.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy as there was no evidence of a current disability beyond the Veteran's already service-connected lumbar radiculopathy.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's peripheral neuropathy and his active duty service, including herbicide exposure. Additional development is needed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to environmental hazards during his active service. The claims will be reconsidered after additional development is conducted.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for renal cell carcinoma, acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy, and tooth loss claimed as due to herbicide exposure. The evidence did not support a finding of in-service exposure or a nexus between the conditions and service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.