The Board has determined that the veteran's bruxism warranted a noncompensable rating from October 2000 to September 2005, and a 10% rating since October 2005. The decision is mixed as some issues were granted (noncompensable rating) while others remain in dispute (rating in excess of 10%).
The deciding factor: The evidence showed that the veteran's bruxism did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating from October 2000 to September 2005, but warranted a 10% rating since October 2005.
- Claimed conditions
- Bruxism
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- March 7, 2007
- Citation
- 0706749
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0706749.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including GAD, MDD, bruxism, migraines/headaches, tinnitus, hip pain, iliotibial band syndrome, and leg stress fractures. The evidence does not support current diagnoses of these conditions during the appeal period.
- Dismissed
The appeal for an initial rating in excess of 70 percent for the service-connected mental health disorder is dismissed. The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance is granted.
- Denied
Service connection for PTSD is denied.,The issue of entitlement to service connection for head trauma and memory loss is dismissed due to concurrent election. The Veteran's claim for adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, which is inextricably intertwined with the PTSD claim, is also remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to errors in obtaining relevant VA treatment records and for the need of an additional medical opinion. The appellant's claim is related to PTSD with bruxism, and the AOJ must obtain all outstanding private treatment records from VA electronic databases and provide a new medical opinion on the severity of his psychiatric disorder prior to February 7, 2023.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.