The Board has found that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for dystonia. The veteran's preexisting dystonia is now considered possibly aggravated by his period of active duty.
The deciding factor: The May 2004 letter from the veteran's VA physician provided a definite opinion regarding aggravation of the pre-existing dystonia condition during service.
- Claimed conditions
- dystonia musculorum deformans
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 12, 2007
- Citation
- 0707254
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0707254.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered additional development due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's dystonia musculorum deformans. The claims for service connection, SMC based on need for aid and attendance, and SMC based on housebound status are inextricably intertwined with the pending claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection of dystonia musculorum deformans, as secondary to her service-connected right and left shoulder disabilities. The case is being returned for an addendum opinion from a clinician.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for dystonia musculorum deformans and special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance or by reason of being housebound due to non-compliance with previous remand directives. The case will be returned after further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and providing proper notice regarding secondary service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.