Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has ordered a remand to obtain additional medical evidence and clarify the nature of the veteran's lung disorder, including whether it is related to service exposure.

The deciding factor: The VA examination report did not adequately address the June 2004 remand instructions regarding the relationship between the veteran's current pulmonary disorders and in-service asbestos exposure.

Claimed conditions
lung disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
Burn pits / airborne hazards
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
March 13, 2007
Citation
0707533

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0707533.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.