The Board has granted an initial rating of 80 percent for the veteran's service-connected chronic actinic damage with history of basal cell carcinomas, effective from March 15, 2004.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence showed numerous skin lesions and extensive procedures involving the nose, ear, and neck. The Board found that these circumstances more nearly approximated a situation where there was gross distortion or asymmetry of three or more features of the head, neck, and face.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic actinic damage, basal cell carcinomas
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 80%
- Decision date
- March 21, 2007
- Citation
- 0708434
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0708434.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for basal cell carcinomas due to an inadequate medical opinion regarding the Veteran's theory of entitlement.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for basal cell carcinomas and multiple actinic keratoses to obtain a new medical opinion addressing the Veteran's in-service sun exposure and post-service radiation exposure.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for skin lesions, including basal and squamous cell carcinomas. The cancers were not found to be related to military service or herbicide exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information regarding the Veteran's skin conditions and their relationship to service, particularly his conceded exposure to Agent Orange. The Veteran was not provided with a VA examination or opinion on this issue.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.