Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has granted service connection for a left knee disorder.,The veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral foot pain was denied in June 2002, but the evidence received since that decision is new and material, reopening his claim. The Board finds no evidence linking the current bilateral foot disorder to service.,Service connection has been granted for a chronic psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia).,The veteran's claims of service connection for headaches with vertigo, fainting, and blurred vision were not addressed in this decision.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the veteran had a current left knee disorder due to an injury during active duty. The evidence established a link between the current condition and his period of service.,New evidence showed treatment for hyperkeratosis, severe left heel pain, and callus on the right small toe after service. This evidence was not considered in the previous denial as it did not show a bilateral foot disorder related to service.,The Board concluded that there is no medical evidence linking the current chronic psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia) to service. The veteran's testimony about symptoms during service was insufficient to establish a link.,The claims for headaches with vertigo, fainting, and blurred vision were not addressed in this decision.

Claimed conditions
left knee disorder (arthritis), bilateral foot pain, chronic psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia), headaches with vertigo, fainting, and blurred vision
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 28, 2007
Citation
0708977

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0708977.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.