Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

For the period beginning March 20, 2003 and ending July 18, 2004, the veteran's hepatitis C was not severe enough to warrant a rating higher than 10 percent.,From July 19, 2004 to September 30, 2006, the veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for a 20 percent evaluation. However, his condition improved after October 1, 2006.

The deciding factor: The veteran's hepatitis C had improved and was no longer severe enough to warrant higher ratings.

Claimed conditions
hepatitis C
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
10%
Decision date
March 29, 2007
Citation
0709220

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0709220.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.