The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to discrepancies in the findings from his VA examination and conflicting diagnoses affecting his eyesight. The RO needs to obtain additional medical records, reconcile previous findings with current ones, and schedule a VA examination for an appropriate specialist.
The deciding factor: There are inconsistencies in the evidence regarding the veteran's eye condition and its severity.
- Claimed conditions
- chorioretinitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 4, 2007
- Citation
- 0709760
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0709760.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for his left eye scar, secondary to toxoplasmosis, due to incomplete development and lack of an updated examination. The issue is being returned for further development.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for chorioretinitis has been reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. Service connection is granted.,Service connection for degenerative arthritis of the mid-back remains pending as it was remanded by the Board.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for residuals of syphilis, other than disability of the eyes, and also denied a TDIU due to lack of evidence showing unemployability caused by service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for chorioretinitis, pain of the mid-back, bilateral hearing loss, and left ear hearing loss have all been denied. The Board found that there was no evidence to support a finding that any of these conditions began during active service or were otherwise related to in-service events.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.