Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has determined that the veteran's atrial fibrillation warranted a 10 percent rating, which was reduced to noncompensable in August 1972. The Board reinstated his prior 10 percent rating due to sustained material improvement not shown at the time of the reduction.

The deciding factor: The evidence did not show sustained material improvement in the veteran's atrial fibrillation that would justify reducing his rating from 10 percent to noncompensable as of November 1, 1972.

Claimed conditions
Atrial Fibrillation
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
10%
Decision date
April 5, 2007
Citation
0709985

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0709985.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.