Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 40 percent, but no more.,Service connection for poor heart circulation (coronary artery disease) is granted and the issue of service connection for a claimed disability manifested by poor heart circulation is dismissed as it is encompassed in the already established coronary artery disease.,The veteran's eye disability is not shown to be related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and thus service connection is denied.,Service connection for a chronic lung disorder, including as a result of exposure to Agent Orange, is granted.

The deciding factor: Diabetes mellitus has been shown to be poorly controlled with multiple medication requirements and restricted diet. The criteria for a 40 percent rating are met based on the need for insulin and regulation of activities.,Service connection for coronary artery disease (already established) encompasses any disability manifested by poor heart circulation, thus this issue is dismissed as service connection has been granted.,The veteran's eye disorder does not meet the criteria for a compensable disability due to diabetes mellitus. The VA examination did not find diabetic retinopathy or neovascularization.,Service connection for chronic lung disorder (including as a result of exposure to Agent Orange) is granted based on the presence of COPD and bronchitis, which are service-connected conditions.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, poor heart circulation (coronary artery disease), eye disability, chronic lung disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
Agent Orange / herbicides
Rating assigned
20%
Decision date
April 11, 2007
Citation
0710420

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0710420.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.