Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The veteran is seeking earlier effective dates for various service-connected conditions and increased ratings.,The veteran seeks an earlier effective date for his service connection for postoperative residuals of left knee surgery, with arthritis of the left knee.,The veteran seeks an earlier effective date for his service connection for right knee arthritis with chronic right knee pain.,The veteran seeks an earlier effective date for his service connection for disc herniation at L3-4.,The veteran seeks an earlier effective date for his service connection for post-traumatic headaches.,The veteran seeks an earlier effective date for his service connection for tinnitus.,The veteran seeks a higher rating for PTSD, specifically seeking an earlier effective date for the 100 percent evaluation.,The veteran seeks an earlier effective date for special monthly compensation based on housebound status.,The veteran seeks an earlier effective date for Dependents' Assistance Allowance under 38 U.S.C.A. Chapter 35.,The veteran seeks increased ratings for his service-connected conditions, including disc herniation at L3-4 and post-traumatic headaches.,The veteran seeks a higher rating for right knee arthritis with chronic right knee pain.,The veteran seeks an increased (compensable) rating for the scar near the right eyebrow.,The veteran seeks an increased rating for bilateral hearing loss.

The deciding factor: The earlier effective dates are sought based on the veteran's service records and the need to correct any prior decisions that did not grant these conditions at the earliest possible date.,The earlier effective date is sought because the veteran was injured during his active duty, specifically in a land mine explosion in Vietnam, which resulted in various injuries including arthritis of the left knee.,The earlier effective date is sought because the veteran was injured during his active duty, specifically in a land mine explosion in Vietnam, which resulted in various injuries including arthritis of the right knee.,The earlier effective date is sought based on the need to correct any prior decisions that did not grant this condition at the earliest possible date.,The earlier effective date is sought because the veteran was injured during his active duty, specifically in a land mine explosion in Vietnam, which resulted in various injuries including headaches.,The earlier effective date is sought because the veteran was injured during his active duty, specifically in a land mine explosion in Vietnam, which resulted in various injuries including tinnitus.,The higher rating for PTSD is sought based on the need to correct any prior decisions that did not grant this condition at the earliest possible date.,The earlier effective date is sought because the veteran was injured during his active duty, specifically in a land mine explosion in Vietnam, which resulted in various injuries including housebound status.,The earlier effective date is sought based on the need to correct any prior decisions that did not grant this condition at the earliest possible date.,Increased ratings are sought for various service-connected conditions, including disc herniation at L3-4 and post-traumatic headaches.,The higher rating for right knee arthritis with chronic right knee pain is sought based on the need to correct any prior decisions that did not grant this condition at the earliest possible date.,The increased (compensable) rating for the scar near the right eyebrow is sought based on the need to correct any prior decisions that did not grant this condition at the earliest possible date.,The higher rating for bilateral hearing loss is sought based on the need to correct any prior decisions that did not grant this condition at the earliest possible date.

Claimed conditions
eye disorder, right leg arthritis, left leg fractures with arthritis, back disorders, post-traumatic headaches, tinnitus
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 13, 2007
Citation
0711016

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0711016.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.