The Board found that the veteran's reported joint pain and degenerative changes are not shown to be medically attributable to any diagnosed underlying pathology. There is no medical evidence of a relationship between the demonstrated degenerative joint disease and any event or incident of his period of active service.
The deciding factor: There is insufficient medical evidence linking the veteran's current joint disorders to his military service, including exposure to toxins associated with the Persian Gulf War.
- Claimed conditions
- granuloma annulare, joint disorder
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 9, 2007
- Citation
- 0713619
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0713619.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that new and relevant evidence supports the Veteran's claim for service connection for granuloma annulare, including as due to herbicide exposure. The Veteran was presumed exposed to herbicides during his military service, and a VA examiner concluded that his current condition is related to this exposure.
- Granted
The Board granted initial disability ratings of 30 percent for chronic sinusitis, 50 percent for migraine headaches, 40 percent for a lumbosacral strain, 20 percent for a cervical strain, and 10 percent for granuloma annulare from May 1, 2023 to January 23, 2024.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for various conditions, including diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, as there was no evidence of in-service injury or disease, chronicity, or continuity of symptomatology. The Veteran's claims were also dismissed due to withdrawal at a hearing.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that further development is required for the Veteran's claims of breathing disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, visual disorder, joint disorder, chemical hypersensitivity disorder, and digestive system disorder. Specifically, a toxic exposure risk activity (TERA) memorandum must be obtained, and new medical opinions are needed to address the etiology of these conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.