The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for joint and muscle pain due to undiagnosed illness, finding that new and material evidence has been received. The veteran's chronic bilateral wrist joint pains are presumed to have resulted from an undiagnosed illness during active military service in Southwest Asia.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence shows objective indications of a chronic condition manifested by bilateral wrist joint pains, which have existed for more than six months and not attributed to a known diagnosis. The veteran served in the Persian Gulf War, qualifying under the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.317.
- Claimed conditions
- Joint Pains, Muscle Pains
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- May 11, 2007
- Citation
- 0713876
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0713876.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for irritable bowel syndrome and remanded the claim for joint pains. The Veteran was granted a 70 percent rating for PTSD with insomnia disorder and alcohol use disorder prior to October 24, 2021, but not thereafter.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and dismissed the claim for joint pains, while remanding the claim for sleep apnea.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for joint pains and degenerative joint disease, finding the evidence does not support a link to service or radiation exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that there has not been substantial compliance with the previous remand directives regarding the issues on appeal, and thus these claims are being returned to the RO for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.