The veteran's claims for increased evaluations were denied as her right and left knee disabilities did not meet the criteria for higher ratings based on current symptomatology.
The deciding factor: The VA examinations showed that the veteran had normal range of motion in both knees, no instability or subluxation, and no significant functional impairment. The pain was well-managed with medication, but did not significantly affect her daily activities or employment.
- Claimed conditions
- Vaginitis, Medial Collateral Ligament Strain of the Right Knee, Patellofemoral Syndrome of the Left Knee, Limitation of Motion of the Right Knee, Limitation of Motion of the Left Knee
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 15, 2007
- Citation
- 0714451
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0714451.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to her service-connected disabilities, finding that she was not unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation consistent with her education and work history.
- Granted
The Veteran's urinary frequency is found to be secondary to her service-connected cervical dysplasia s/p cryosurgery.,There is at least approximate balance of evidence regarding whether the Veteran's GERD is caused by her service-connected cervical dysplasia s/p cryosurgery, female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), and vaginitis.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a compensable rating for vaginitis prior to October 6, 2020 and a rating greater than 10 percent from that date. The evidence was found to be against the need for continuous treatment of symptoms before October 6, 2020, and against uncontrolled symptoms with continuous treatment after that date.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render him unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation prior to October 9, 2021. The Board found that the Veteran was still employed at the time of his appeal.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.