Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied the veteran's claim for an initial rating greater than 30 percent for bilateral nephrocalcinosis, finding that the RO had not complied with prior remand instructions and that a new VA examination was needed to assess the current severity of his disability.

The deciding factor: The decision is based on the failure to comply with previous Board's remand orders regarding obtaining recent medical records and scheduling an updated VA examination.

Claimed conditions
bilateral nephrocalcinosis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
30%
Decision date
May 21, 2007
Citation
0715121

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0715121.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.