The veteran's claim for a higher evaluation of her lumbosacral strain is being remanded due to the need for new evidence and examination.
The deciding factor: The case requires additional medical evidence and an updated VA examination to determine the current extent of the veteran's disability.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic lumbosacral spine strain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 23, 2007
- Citation
- 0715250
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0715250.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for initial compensable evaluations for his service-connected left knee fracture, chronic left quadriceps muscle strain, and chronic lumbosacral spine strain are being remanded due to the need for additional development including a VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) due to new and material evidence. The claims for fibromyalgia, chronic lumbosacral spine strain, and acquired stenosis of the cervical spine are remanded for further development.
- Granted
The veteran's appeal for an increased evaluation of her service-connected chronic lumbosacral spine strain is granted, with a final rating of 40 percent effective from the date of this decision. The claim for service connection for bilateral pes planus remains pending.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.