The veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for aid and attendance of another person is being remanded due to ambiguity in his service-connected disabilities and the need for a more contemporaneous examination.
The deciding factor: The case was remanded because there were questions regarding the current severity of the veteran's service-connected disabilities, which could impact his need for aid and attendance.
- Claimed conditions
- sympathetic instability of unknown cause, degenerative joint disease of the lumbar and cervical spines, osteoarthritis of the right elbow
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 25, 2007
- Citation
- 0715740
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0715740.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected right knee, right elbow, and low back disabilities caused or aggravated his obesity, which in turn may have contributed to his obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the cases for further evaluation due to concerns about the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected osteoarthritis of the left and right elbows.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's appeal involves multiple conditions related to knee and elbow osteoarthritis, as well as neurological disorders of the upper and lower extremities. The issues are all secondary to herbicide exposure (presumably burn pit exposure). The Board has remanded for additional STRs from September 1988 to March 1989.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including VA examinations to assess the severity of her service-connected osteoporosis and arthritis, as well as a determination on whether her current arthritis is related to her service or service-connected conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.