The veteran's claims for increased ratings for bilateral patellofemoral joint disease of the knees and entitlement to TDIU were denied. The RO found that the evidence did not show ankylosis, nonunion of the tibia and fibula with loose motion, or extension limited to 30 degrees to warrant evaluations in excess of 30 percent.
The deciding factor: The VA examinations showed full range of motion for both knees without instability or subluxation, which precluded separate ratings based on arthritis and instability. The veteran's subjective complaints included pain and instability but no objective findings of nonunion of the tibia and fibula, ankylosis, or extension limited to 30 degrees.
- Claimed conditions
- patellofemoral joint disease of the right knee, patellofemoral joint disease of the left knee
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 4, 2007
- Citation
- 0716463
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0716463.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's clothing was damaged by his service-connected bilateral knee braces, and he is granted a clothing allowance for 2015.
- Whole decision: Denied
The veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were denied. The Board found no evidence of current ankle disabilities, and the low back disability was rated at 10%.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations and service connection, finding that the evidence did not support a compensable evaluation or an increase in disability rating for his left foot condition from January 8, 2001 through August 6, 2002. For the period beginning August 7, 2002, the Board found no more than moderate disability of the left foot.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.