The appellant is not entitled to reinstatement of dependency and indemnity compensation as the divorced helpless child of the veteran due to the termination of her marriage by divorce, which does not meet the legal criteria for reinstatement under VA regulations.
The deciding factor: The appellant's marriage was terminated by divorce after November 1, 1990, and therefore does not qualify for reinstatement of dependency and indemnity compensation as a child of the veteran due to her marriage termination.
- Claimed conditions
- permanently incapable of self-support
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 12, 2007
- Citation
- 0717560
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0717560.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case to obtain clarification on whether the appellant was permanently incapable of self-support at her 18th birthday due to a skin condition, and to determine if she had completed high school education.
- Denied
The veteran's adult daughter, who was permanently incapable of self-support prior to her 18th birthday, is denied retroactive benefits as the claim for dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) was not received within one year of entitlement or before her 18th birthday.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.