The Board found no current asbestos related lung disorder and denied the veteran's claim for service connection.
The deciding factor: There is no objective evidence of an asbestos-related lung disorder, and the VA examiner concluded there was no current asbestos-related pleural disease or asbestosis based on clinical tests and imaging studies.
- Claimed conditions
- Asbestos-related lung disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 28, 2007
- Citation
- 0719581
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0719581.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's lung disorder, including pleural disease with pleural plaques and asbestosis, is found to be related to in-service exposure to asbestos. The acquired psychiatric disorders, including PTSD and anxiety neurosis, are also found to be related to service. However, the initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss disability remains denied.
- Granted
The Veteran's calcified pleural plaques in the left hemithorax are at least as likely as not related to asbestos exposure during service. As a result, the Board finds that the Veteran's calcified pleural plaques were incurred in service and grants service connection for this condition.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.