The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection for her bilateral hip disability, finding that there was no evidence linking her current hip disorders to service or a service-connected condition.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not attribute the veteran's hip disorder to any service-connected disabilities, including her spine conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral hip bursitis, osteoarthritis of the bilateral hips
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 19, 2007
- Citation
- 0721655
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0721655.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities, but denied an increased disability rating for the Veteran's herniated nucleus pulposus with post-traumatic arthritis of the lumbar spine.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him in need of regular aid and attendance, as he is unable to dress or undress himself, keep himself clean and presentable, prepare his own meals, and protect himself from daily hazards. The Board has granted entitlement to SMC(l).
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for a low back condition, tibia and fibula bone fractures, bilateral hip bursitis, left hip condition, right hip condition, pleurisy (chest pain), left foot condition, right foot condition, and an acquired psychiatric disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that there was not substantial compliance with its previous remand instructions and thus the case is being returned for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.