The Board finds that the veteran does not have residuals of mumps, including testicular atrophy, hydroceles and varicosities, related to service. The most probative evidence shows no current abnormalities or absence of the testicles.
The deciding factor: The November 2002 ultrasound and January 2007 VA examiner's opinion support the finding that the veteran does not have residuals of mumps, including testicular atrophy, hydroceles and varicosities, related to his active service.
- Claimed conditions
- testicular atrophy, hydroceles, varicosities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 23, 2007
- Citation
- 0722385
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0722385.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for an earlier effective date for service connection for testicular atrophy and special monthly compensation, as well as higher initial ratings for PTSD and TDIU prior to September 16, 2008.
- Granted
The Veteran's initial disability rating for left calf varicosities has been granted at a 20 percent level. The claim of increased rating for the scar, left lower extremity, status post vein stripping is remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of left varicocele surgery and atrophy of the testis due to inadequate medical opinions and the need to obtain additional treatment records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a genitourinary disability, other than service-connected circumcision with erectile dysfunction and service-connected penile rash. The appeal is remanded due to conflicting medical opinions regarding the cause of the Veteran's current conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.