The Board denied the veteran's petition to reopen his claim for service connection for excision of an undescended left testicle, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted.
The deciding factor: No new and material evidence was received to substantiate the claim for service connection for post-operative residuals of a left orchiectomy.
- Claimed conditions
- undescended left testicle
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 30, 2007
- Citation
- 0723368
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0723368.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's hypertension is not service-connected as there is no evidence of a disability within the first post-service year and no link to service.,Bilateral hearing loss was not found, with both ears meeting normal hearing criteria. Service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied.,Service connection for undescended left testicle is not granted as it is considered a congenital defect without evidence of a superimposed disability.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for left orchiectomy, finding that there was no evidence of an in-service injury to his left testicle and thus unable to establish a nexus between any current condition and service.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD and did not reopen his previously denied claim for surgical removal of undescended left testicle due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.