The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records from VA facilities and conducting any necessary examinations.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed to properly evaluate the veteran's claims for service connection due to incomplete file from VA medical centers.
- Claimed conditions
- fungus of the groin, fungus of bilateral feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 10, 2007
- Citation
- 0724865
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0724865.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence to grant service connection for a fungal infection of the groin and feet, finding it at least as likely as not that these conditions began during the Veteran's period of active service in Vietnam.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to incomplete development of his VA treatment records from 1970 to February 2000 and since June 1, 2009.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical records and conflicting opinions regarding the Veteran's service connection claim for fungus of the groin and bilateral feet.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.