Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has jurisdiction to consider whether the claim should be reopened and what the RO determined in this regard is irrelevant. The case is REMANDED for further evidentiary development.

The deciding factor: Further medical evidence is needed to determine if the brain tumor had onset during service or within the presumptive period following service.

Claimed conditions
Left cerebellar hemangioblastoma, Seizure disorder
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
August 17, 2007
Citation
0725637

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0725637.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.