Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The veteran's claim to restore the 20 percent rating for his HNP at L5-S1 on the left has been granted.,The veteran's claim to reopen for service connection for sleep apnea was not supported by new and material evidence, resulting in denial of this claim.,Service connection for hypertension was denied.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus was denied.,Service connection for GERD was denied.,Service connection for a dental disorder was denied.,Secondary service connection for right hip, shoulder, and knee disorders was denied.

The deciding factor: The veteran's claim to restore the 20 percent rating for his HNP at L5-S1 on the left is granted based on the evidence showing that the disability picture associated with this condition more nearly approximates the criteria for a 40 percent schedular evaluation.,The veteran did not serve in Vietnam and there is no presumption of exposure to herbicide agents. There is also no medical evidence linking hypertension or diabetes mellitus to service, nor can it be presumed due to service.,Service connection on a direct basis for sleep apnea was denied by RO action in October 1995 and the veteran did not appeal this decision within one year of receiving notice of such denial. The claim is therefore final.,The veteran's claims for service connection for GERD, diabetes mellitus, and secondary service connection for right hip, shoulder, and knee disorders are denied as there is no showing of a nexus between these conditions and his period of military service or any event thereof.

Claimed conditions
Herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) at L5-S1 on the left, with degenerative disc disease and sciatica
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
20%
Decision date
September 5, 2007
Citation
0727760

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0727760.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.