The RO has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination. The veteran's disability rating of 30 percent for her right foot condition will remain in effect until further notice.
The deciding factor: The case was remanded due to the need for additional evidence and an updated VA examination.
- Claimed conditions
- post-operative dislocation syndrome, hammertoe deformities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- September 6, 2007
- Citation
- 0727904
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0727904.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral foot condition, and it is now on the merits. The Veteran contends that his pre-existing bilateral foot conditions were aggravated by his period of active duty service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and a medical opinion regarding the Veteran's foot disabilities.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of fractures of the left tibia and fibula with hammertoe deformities are rated at 30 percent for impairment of the ankle, and a separate rating of 20 percent is assigned for impairment of the foot.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of cold injury of the feet is denied as there is no objective evidence of any in-service cold injury and his assertions of continuity of foot symptoms since service are not credible. The current diagnosed foot disabilities do not have a medical nexus to service, including the alleged cold injury.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.