Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The veteran sustained nerve damage as a result of a July 2003 VA thoracotomy, which was a reasonably foreseeable risk. The veteran was not properly informed of the risk of nerve damage prior to the operation and this disclosure was not considered a minor deviation from the informed consent requirement.

The deciding factor: The failure to disclose the risk of nerve damage as a side effect of the July 2003 VA thoracotomy constituted a fault on the part of VA, meeting one of the criteria for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.

Claimed conditions
nerve damage
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 7, 2007
Citation
0728094

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0728094.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.