The veteran's claims are not yet ready for appellate review due to missing records and deficiencies in VA's duty to notify. The case is REMANDED for obtaining relevant medical records, providing proper notice under 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(b), and readjudicating the claims.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there are deficiencies in VA's duty to assist and notify the veteran, necessitating a remand to obtain missing records and provide proper notification.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of vision, right eye
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 14, 2007
- Citation
- 0728988
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0728988.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to loss of vision in the right eye has been dismissed because the Veteran died during the pendency of the appeal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development and examination, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's conditions are related to his in-service exposure to ionizing radiation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and information from the Social Security Administration.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.