The Board has referred the case back to the RO due to new evidence submitted by the veteran, and an SSOC should be furnished accordingly.
The deciding factor: New medical evidence from a VA internist was submitted after the initial decision, necessitating further review by the RO.
- Claimed conditions
- gum disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 19, 2007
- Citation
- 0732980
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0732980.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for diabetes, gum disease, hypertension, orthopedic foot disorder, left shoulder disorder, right shoulder disorder, hepatitis C, skin disorder of the feet (claimed as trench foot), and an acquired psychiatric disorder (claimed as depression and anxiety) due to errors in duty to assist.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a dental disability, including gum disease and loss of teeth, is denied as there is no evidence of in-service trauma or bone disease resulting in compensable dental disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for service connection due to incomplete development of his records and failure to provide adequate notice and examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has dismissed the appeal regarding service connection for teeth grinding due to procedural issues. Service connection is granted for bilateral hearing loss, but the claim must be remanded as there are missing records and the Veteran needs to provide authorization for VA to obtain relevant private dental treatment records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.