The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to inadequate examination and discrepancies between diagnostic testing and clinical assessment.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner was unable to comment on all factors considered in DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (1995), specifically any functional loss due to flare-ups, and there are discrepancies between the medical evidence and clinical assessments regarding ulnar neuropathy.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of an injury to the right arm, right elbow
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 19, 2007
- Citation
- 0733038
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0733038.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for automobile or adaptive equipment was denied as she does not have service-connected physical loss of use of her hands, permanent impairment of vision in both eyes, a severe burn injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or ankylosis of the knees or hips.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran is seeking an earlier effective date for a 30 percent evaluation for cold urticaria, which was initially granted in June 2015. The Board finds that further development is needed to determine the appropriate effective date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that new and relevant evidence was submitted to reopen the claims for service connection for various disabilities, including left knee, right knee, bilateral foot, bilateral hearing loss, left elbow, right elbow, and sleep apnea. The claims are now remanded for further adjudication.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for disabilities of the middle finger, left hand; index finger, left hand; left knee; right knee; right foot; right elbow and right hip. The evidence is not persuasive in favor of a current disability related to these conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.