The veteran's claim for service connection for a skin disease, specifically hydradenitis suppurativa, is being remanded due to the need for additional development and review of his claims file.
The deciding factor: The case requires an addendum report from a qualified dermatologist to determine the etiology of the veteran's current skin diseases, including whether they are linked to service or exposure to herbicides in Vietnam.
- Claimed conditions
- hydradenitis suppurativa
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 24, 2007
- Citation
- 0733297
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0733297.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for vaginal conditions, gastric bypass with residual hernias, bilateral knee conditions, bilateral shin splints, and bilateral foot conditions as they were not found to be related to the Veteran's service or service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's skin conditions have worsened, and the VA examination did not address his use of antibiotics. The Board has ordered a new examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected tinea cruris and hydradenitis suppurativa.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the reopening of a claim for service connection for chronic lesions, finding that new and material evidence was not submitted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's initial disability rating for his service-connected folliculitis of the scalp was increased to 10 percent, but he is seeking a higher rating. The Board has decided that more evidence is needed and remanded the case.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.