The Board of Veterans' Appeals found that the veteran's disability does not prevent him from achieving his goal of obtaining a post-secondary education, and therefore, feasibility of vocational rehabilitation training under Chapter 31 is not demonstrated.
The deciding factor: The veteran's current employment at Intel Corporation was deemed appropriate for his abilities and aptitudes, thus preventing the need for vocational rehabilitation services.
- Claimed conditions
- ankle condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 25, 2007
- Citation
- 0733591
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0733591.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for skin rash, hand/knuckles disability, shoulder strain, and pes planus. The claims for gastro issues, right knee strain, knee arthritis, back problems as secondary to knee, and ankle condition were remanded for further development.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for foot pain and an ankle condition as the evidence did not support a current diagnosis related to these conditions during or after active service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, an ankle condition, and neck strain due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error regarding scheduling VA examinations.
- Granted
The Veteran's TDIU rating, which included his PTSD, knee, and ankle conditions, was granted. The Board found that the granting of SMC based on housebound status should be restored because there is a factual question regarding whether the Veteran was housebound.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.