The veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected herniated nucleus pulposus at L5-S1 and adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features were denied. The current rating of 40 percent for the herniated nucleus pulposus is found to be appropriate based on the severity of his symptoms prior to September 26, 2003.
The deciding factor: The veteran's service-connected low back disability did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation under the old rating criteria due to lack of pronounced intervertebral disc syndrome. His adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features also did not warrant an increased rating as it did not demonstrate occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity or difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships.
- Claimed conditions
- Herniated nucleus pulposus at L5-S1, Adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- October 26, 2007
- Citation
- 0733872
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0733872.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features secondary to a service-connected disability, but remanded the claims for skin and left upper extremity disorders due to insufficient evidence.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the appellant's claim and found that he was insane at the time of his misconduct, thus not barring him from receiving VA benefits. The character of his service is therefore not a bar to VA compensation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and need for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records, verifying stressors related to sexual assault by Staff Sgt. E, and scheduling a VA examination.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, depression NOS, adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features, and dysthymic disorder. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions are related to his active military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.