The Board has remanded the appeal due to additional evidence submitted by the appellant and a need for further consideration of whether the appellant timely filed a claim for accrued benefits.
The deciding factor: The appellant's August 2000 disagreement with the denial of service connection for the cause of the veteran's death was not addressed in the most recent Supplemental Statement of the Case (SSOC). The Board also needs to determine if the appellant timely filed and disagreed with the denial of accrued benefits.
- Claimed conditions
- neuroendocrine cancer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 30, 2007
- Citation
- 0734117
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0734117.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for service connection due to a failure to adequately develop the Veteran's exposure allegations and because VA examinations are needed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence and potential errors in decision-making. The Veteran's conditions are presumed related to Agent Orange exposure, but a VA opinion is needed to address this claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for neuroendocrine cancer, colon cancer, and an acquired psychiatric disability due to service connection issues. A medical opinion is needed to address the relationship between these conditions and exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and neuroendocrine cancer are due to his exposure to Agent Orange during active duty. The right jaw surgery is also linked to the Veteran's service-connected neuroendocrine cancer.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.