The veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for degenerative disc disease, L5-S1 prior to May 17, 2000 was denied. The current rating of 10 percent is appropriate and there is no basis for an increased rating.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not show findings that more nearly approximate moderate intervertebral disc syndrome with recurring attacks or severe limitation of motion prior to May 17, 2000.
- Claimed conditions
- degenerative disc disease, L5-S1
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- November 2, 2007
- Citation
- 0734759
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0734759.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's request for additional VR&E equipment purchases and other services under a program of independent living services, including a riding lawnmower, power tools, attending school far from home, childcare, and a vehicle, was denied due to the severity of his service-connected disabilities. The Board has ordered further development to address these issues.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for left shoulder and back disabilities due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The Veteran's tinnitus claim is granted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development due to a lack of recent medical examination and updated treatment records. The Veteran's disability ratings for his bilateral knee and lumbar spine conditions are being reviewed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to an inadequate VA examination, and a new one is required for proper evaluation of the Veteran's back disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.