The veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for regular aid and attendance or housebound status is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination.
The deciding factor: The case requires a VA examination to determine the current level of severity of the service-connected disabilities and whether they are productive of the veteran requiring the aid and attendance of another or being housebound.
- Claimed conditions
- post-operative residuals of neurofibroma of the lower back, erythema multiforme
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 7, 2007
- Citation
- 0735101
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0735101.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted a TDIU effective November 10, 1998. The Veteran's service-connected conditions of COPD, GERD, and skin disorders have rendered him unemployable since at least that date.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's erythema multiforme prevents him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation, and he is granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's skin disabilities are associated with gas chamber training during service. The Board has ordered a VA examination to determine the presence and relation of these disabilities to his service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for revision of a November 1969 rating decision that assigned a noncompensable rating for erythema multiforme, finding no clear and unmistakable error in the original determination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.